罗马就德罗西禁赛三场的处罚向欧足练纪律委员会提出上诉
但没有就帕努奇的两场禁赛上诉。因此已经是最终裁决
我个人理解看，俱乐部的做法是厚此薄彼的。
照理帕努奇的禁赛更有理由上诉
因此有人猜测，帕努奇的近日的举动是否是对俱乐部做法的不满？
可能有一些合理性吧
不管帕努奇后来的做法怎样，俱乐部应该努力维护球员的利益
否则难免影响在球员心目中的信任度和形象
来自欧足联官方网站
http://www.uefa.com/competitions/UCL/news/Kind=1/newsId=249742.html
Roma contest De Rossi decision
Wednesday, 27 October 2004
AS Roma have lodged an appeal against the three-match ban imposed on midfielder Daniele De Rossi for his dismissal for violent conduct in the Italian club's recent UEFA Champions League tie against Bayer 04 Leverkusen. The appeals hearing is likely to take place on 19 November.
Video evidence
De Rossi was due to be suspended for one game after being shown a red card in the 87th minute of the Group B encounter in Germany. However, UEFA announced last Friday that the ban had been extended to three matches by UEFA's Control and Disciplinary Body after reviewing video evidence. De Rossi was sent off after he kicked out at Leverkusen's Jacek Krzynówek.
Panucci ban final
Meanwhile, the decision to hand a two-game ban to another Roma player, Christian Panucci, has become final as there has been no appeal. Panucci was red-carded in the 61st minute of the same match for elbowing Krzynówek as the two players rose for a header. The Control and Disciplinary Body decided that this example of particularly rough play merited a two-game suspension.
|
发表于 2004-10-24 03:47:00
发表于 2004-10-28 05:06:00
发表于 2004-10-28 05:24:00